A Little About Buzzen!

Buzzen using MSN's ocx falls in the same category as connecting Vincula to a chatroom.

What is it? | |

| | M$NChatX is an Alternate Hacked OCX That allows | |

| | itself AND the "Official" MSN Chat Control to be | |

| | Registered at the SAME time, Therefor eliminating | |

| | The need to re-register the Hacked OCX whenever it | |

| | is required, therfore making Connection Scripts | |

| | work more efficently and faster (also less | |

| | problems) | |

| | P.S. M$NChatX can use ANY Port

no it doesn't

last time i checked exo wasn't making money by doing it.

lol weird :s .

Was it legal or Illegal the way vincula was made to connect to MSN

FYI a 140Mbps DDoS flood will take down about %95 of all the websites in the world.

heh....140mbps DDoS is not enough to even down a minor Internet tier cloud.

140mbit distributed attack, even if utilizing broadcasts would suffer from fragmentation, 140mbit would quickly turn into 30mbit with 90mbit spikes.

heh....140mbps DDoS is not enough to even down a minor Internet tier cloud.

140mbit distributed attack, even if utilizing broadcasts would suffer from fragmentation, 140mbit would quickly turn into 30mbit with 90mbit spikes.

approx %95 of all websites are hosted at home or in a mass hosting enviroment. Standard hosts only have 100Mbps uplinks. No host is gonna optimize there network for overhead when they can optimize it for profits.

Was it legal or Illegal the way vincula was made to connect to MSN

Legal. It used the MSN ocx on the MSN server, so, there was nothing illegal about it. And no, mIRC on MSN was not illegal. It wasnt supported.

lol X you are doing exactly what i said people would do.. Comparing editing a connection to connect to the msn network vs using the msn ocx to make yourself money isn't the same thing.. don't try to justify it.. you can't.

lol :tongue:

approx %95 of all websites are hosted at home or in a mass hosting enviroment. Standard hosts only have 100Mbps uplinks. No host is gonna optimize there network for overhead when they can optimize it for profits.

there is no standard 100mbit SONET link. SONET standard starts at OC-1, which is 51.8mbit with a payload of 50mbit next step up is OC-3, at 155mbit (150mbit). "100mbit link" is usually a 100mbit NIC to an OC-3 or less.

OC-1

 

OC-1 is a SONET line with transmission speeds of up to 51.84 Mbit/s (payload: 50.112 Mbit/s; overhead: 1.728 Mbit/s) using optical fiber. This base rate is multiplied for use by other OC-n standards. For example, an OC-3 connection is 3 times the rate of OC-1.

 

OC-3

 

OC-3 is a network line with transmission speeds of up to 155.52 Mbit/s (payload: 150.336 Mbit/s; overhead: 5.184 Mbit/s) using fiber optics. Depending on the system OC-3 is also known as STS-3 (electrical level) and STM-1 (SDH).

 

When OC-3 is not multiplexed by carrying the data from a single source the letter c (standing for concatenated) is appended: OC-3c.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_Carrier

read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-carrier , Internet backbone technology. otice none of it says anything about 100mbit...

even DWDM and TDM (fiber division and time division multiplexing) is in increments of 155mbit average.

omg i've been sitting here for an hour hypnotized by x-fusions rotating user tags

You too? I sat there for 20 minutes.... just for the first one.

ctrl + alt + del user

Edit: I still haven't seen any real answer about lying to make money from chatters or is that off topic?

Stop flogging a dead horse lol!

so yahoo , your saying buzzen is a dead horse and we need to stop floging it ?

so yahoo , your saying buzzen is a dead horse and we need to stop floging it ?

Im quite sure thats exactly what he meant

lol

nothing wrong with emptying a clip into a dead thing...

sounds like yahoo is tenderising the meat.

There you go Deanne

http://www.buzzen.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8234

 

P.S i don`t think you remember me! It is so easy to hate someone so quickly lol

Thanks for posting the link, unfortunately I still can't view the discussion as I'm still banned lol.

Yahoo, I do remember you, and I don't hate you. I'm just saddened by your choice to continue trying to justify buzzens actions, and following in their footsteps of misleading statements and games of word twisting. I always thought you were smarter than that Yahoo?

btw, it was buzzen admin jay who started this whole discussion again, wasn't it?

He started it because he knows lots of people would post and give publicity. Negative or not its still publicity. As you would have noticed for about a week there wasnt one post about buzzen.