2006 IRCX/IRCXPRO Screen shots

very nice good job

@err0r: Yeah, I like that one... Looks finished enough to me

@Travis: That's way to busy for me. That's just me though. I'm a minimalistic kind of guy when it comes to interface.

Do you mean my popup menu? I was wondering if my menu's had too many options.

i think it looks great you done well mate

For a connection, I personally have always liked a barebone connection. I dont need all the extra hoo-ha with it, like aop lists, buzzes, etc. I'd like to incorporate that myself, so I wont have to worry about playing with the connection if I wanted to make my own.

For a connection, I personally have always liked a barebone connection. I dont need all the extra hoo-ha with it, like aop lists, buzzes, etc. I'd like to incorporate that myself, so I wont have to worry about playing with the connection if I wanted to make my own.

I agreee Barebone Connection is the best idea gives everyone the chance to design an build it how they like

there are users and roomowners that can't script but they like using a script that has a nice interface.

I started out with a connection and now I have added protections and an AoP list. I decided that most scripters like to make their own connection anyways. You can use SoulFly as a standalone connection if you like however, simply disable the menu codes in SoulFly.mrc to use the normal popup menus. The scripter gains all the tools I have created to do what they want on VSIXc.

Things like, a command to clear a user completely from the access list without deleting the whole thing. A tool that will return the full channel name with a search string. Simple interface to have a global and local AoP list. Management of up to 10 accounts at once.

There are a lot of tools the normal scripter would have at their disposal if they wish to try SoulFly, but it is geared for the person who doesn't know how to script.

Awesome, bro. I've been out of the scripting scene for awhile, because of work, and personal things. However, I'm going to start back soon. Are you going to make this public?

Yes sir! Very soon!

Well Life happens, I'm glad to see you still kicking around and look forward to seeing you around more!

Very Nice Travis

lol I guess your style of UI is not my taste because I wouldn't be able to use that for very long because I would get so annoyed by everything lol. no offense :\

lol I guess your style of UI is not my taste because I wouldn't be able to use that for very long because I would get so annoyed by everything lol. no offense :\

I love what you've done Travis

btw it will be nice to have you back warrior--looking forward to it.

JOsh typically when you slam something you should give examples.

"lol I guess your style of UI is not my taste" : What style of ui?

"because I wouldn't be able to use that for very long because I would get so annoyed by everything."

What would annoy you? You dont have to tell me here since this is a thread for screenshots, but I'd like to know. The two main questions I ask beta testers is, what don't you like about it. What would you do different. (and please try to break it!)

As you can see from previous screenshots, Josh's idea of UI is simple and sleek. Yours appears to be one of menus and dialogs. I think hes just trying to say that what you've done isnt his style, and he wouldnt go for it. I'm more like Josh and err0r, I'm simple and to the point and I personally dont like my stuff overloaded, but, that could be because some are old school and some are new school.

Shrugs

I guess I don't understand you looking for faults. Whats a script without dialogs and popup menus? But thats cool, I don't expect to please everyone.

Anyways ...

I have been wanting this translator for a while so yesterday, as soon as I got it I set to work! The goal is to put all functions in one toolbar underneath the edit box, but I've never made a dockable toolbar before so it may take some time.

Pick ONE name from the nicklist and it will translate what they say. Set up your 2nd edit box to always show the command to translate and talk to people in the room in a different language! Or simply open the translator dialog to translate what you like! This uses babelfish so you will have to tailor what you give it to get the most out of it. In other words, learn to use the translator. It translates French the best.

i think what he means is all the icons and different colors.

Depending on my mood i like different types. pr0metheusX has alot of images and user colors etc.

The script i prefer to chat with has nothing on it and strips the colors. ( although i'm making sort of a hybrid that is a cross between the two, i'll post ss's later )

few things that turn me off on yours, Green ( but that's just me, i'm not big on green ) and i prefer smaller fonts. But over all i'd say the script seems pretty functional. You are never going to please everyone with the look of your script but looks aren't as important as what the script can do and how easy it is to do it. Two of the most popular msn scripts ever Hybrid Omega and Kenobi have themes i really didn't like but you see how popular they became. So trying to please everyone with looks is probably a waste of time. Just do what you like. I would bet you spent more time coding the functions of the script than the look anyways.

Each with there own views and opinions and Travis so long as your happy with your work thats all that really matters good luck with the rest of the update you do

i like soulfly ,

lots of owners and / or hosts will be glad with soulfly

I wasn't "slamming" your script. Maybe I could have worded it differently. X-Fusion put it nicely.. You have an old school type of look. err0r also pointed out all the colors. I just don't like all those colors you've used everywhere.. It looks like the main theme is green, but there's blues, yellows, reds... I don't know.. The menu's look like there's just too much in them. The fonts are just not my style either. I prefer having either Arial, Tahoma, or Verdana used in my script for fonts, not Times New Roman or Georgia.

I'm not sure.. I just don't like the look of it, but yes it does look very functional.

My style of UI is very clean cut and simple. I don't like having huge amounts of dialogs and I don't like having huge amounts of menus.

Sorry if it seemed like I was "slamming" your script. I thought I was just giving my opinion.