Buzzen Chats New Layout and Design.

</off topic>

Gonna stir it up here a bit, anyway yahoo if ya heard or know of this guy let me know.

yup i know of rowan!

Since your telling us your gonna stir it up, does that mean I can close it ahead of time?

I think it's his aim... To just piss people off

Well, in any case, if you cant support Active X, you cant use Buzzen V2, because Flash Player IS an Active X.

But I seen "for new buzzen, not any components is needed, and active x are not secured". Not true.

 

Flash Player = Active X = needed for Buzzen V2 = Buzzen V2 not compatible with IE 64 bits for example, or not compatible with an IE without Active X support (or if user had turn it off).

 

Then lol buzzen V2 need an active X

 

And in any case, Buzzen v2 way is very so slow... I dont know how it's possible that coders imagine that users will be agree with that...

=>

Furthermore, people have choice of clients. At the moment server supports flash, ajax, and mirc clients. In future, there will be support for activex client, and other kind of applets and clients.

The ones who still have a 56k connection these days and who wants to chat @ Buzzen when v2 is released will just have to choose another client than that Ajax/XForms/whatever one

waits patiently for X-Fusion to throw more sarcasm at Buzzen, he cant stand for anyone to get the best of him, he will even go as far as re-opening a topic just to post a remark.

Wow .. first of all, Josh reopened the topic, due to Yahoo asking it to be reopened. TYVM

Uh, yeah, I closed it because it veered into off-topic heaven lol. You're so dumb XploziOn lol You should really get the facts straight before you go off blurting things you think are true

i re-opened it

most topics wander a little

=>

The ones who still have a 56k connection these days and who wants to chat @ Buzzen when v2 is released will just have to choose another client than that Ajax/XForms/whatever one

Or another chat service

Josh your avatar fits your personality, you really must be an Emoticon. not to mention being a band camp geek.

Josh your avatar fits your personality, you really must be an Emoticon. not to mention being a band camp geek.

lol .. i knew the band camp joke would come into play.

And, it's not 'emoticon' .. its emo-ticon. In other words, Emo ..

buzzen chatter will love this chat for one there is no ocx that they need to download most chatters have problems with the chat ocx it either gets corrupted while the download or something happends and then they start witching that they cant get into chat with this it takes out that problem most chatter want something simple like error said back in this post 90% of the chatter wont give a i flying f if its an ocx or what ever as long as its easy to use and the design of the webchat works for them and is pleasent on the eyes that is why msn was such a hit from alot of the chat servers well one of the reasons there are alot more reasons to it to but anyways and like error said the 10% of people that will critisize well the the computer savy.

my self i think it is coming along real nice and theres been alot of work put into it you can tell its not easy to come up with something original like they have but ofcourse thats my opinion.

Cheers To all

I never put that user title there... Ozzy10 did a year or two ago. Oh and your avatar doesn't fit your personality at all.... If only this was the right deminsions *sigh*

if josh starts to say the following

"this one time at band camp .................."

RUN

you muttered those words... i believe we should all start running now!

What's a 'band camp'?

*runs*

 

Or another chat service

Yep and it is taken into account aswell and... for sure; if french-speaking chatters prefer another chat service without a minimum of professionalism, they're the only ones concerned (I'm talking about the FRENCH chat sites I know of course).. Buzzen is not that stupid; we know there will be a chatter loss but Buzzen will at least gain in credibility because it won't be an MSN-Clone anymore and I think everyone here agrees that the credibility is more important than the amount of chatters.

If they're not a lot to leave, well, that will be a good point but the debate ends here I guess